# PUCL Challenges ECI’s Nationwide Electoral Roll Revision

## Supreme Court to Examine Concerns Over Scope of Revision

The People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has taken a significant step, filing a petition before the Supreme Court to challenge the Election Commission of India's (ECI) decision to conduct a **Special Intensive Revision (SIR)** of electoral rolls across the entire nation. This move raises serious questions about the scope and legality of the ECI’s action, particularly its immediate implementation in Bihar, just months before the upcoming state assembly elections.

---

**Key Takeaways & Features:**

-   **Supreme Court Review:** The case will now be heard by the highest court in India, offering a critical examination of the ECI’s mandate.
-   **Arbitrary Action:** PUCL alleges the SIR is "arbitrary and unlawful," raising concerns about potential misuse of the process.
-   **Bihar Implementation:** The immediate roll-out in Bihar is the core of the challenge, raising questions about timing and potential disenfranchisement.
-   **Electoral Integrity:** The petition underscores the importance of maintaining **electoral integrity** and safeguarding voter rights.

---

The PUCL argues that the nationwide SIR is an overreach of the ECI’s authority and could lead to the unnecessary and potentially disruptive removal of voters from electoral rolls.  Specifically, the organization claims the timing, coinciding with an election, is particularly concerning. The ECI, however, maintains that the SIR is a necessary measure to update voter data and ensure accurate electoral rolls.  This legal battle is likely to have significant implications for the upcoming Bihar elections and could set a precedent for future electoral roll revisions across India.

The ongoing legal challenge highlights the tension between administrative efficiency and the fundamental right to vote, reminding us of the crucial role of judicial oversight in safeguarding democratic processes. 

[adsense]

# Paying for Dates? Gen Z Has Opinions -- & They're Not What You'd Expect
![title](https://api.nakmo.net/media/images/zQi79esKCZq9-1e22a622-5bb8-441b-a547-e304cc339ee775-medium_webp.webp)
## A Generational Clash: Who Pays on a Modern Date?
Scott Galloway's recent commentary on dating, suggesting men should always pay, has sparked a fascinating discussion, particularly among younger generations. But what do Gen Z actually think about who should foot the bill on a date? We spoke to members of the SheKnows Teen Council to uncover their perspectives – and the results reveal a surprising blend of traditional sentiment and modern expectations.
---
-   **Traditional Values Persist:** Despite a focus on equality, some teens still appreciate it when a date offers to pay.
-   **Fairness is Key:**  The dominant vibe among Gen Z is a desire for fairness and reciprocity in dating.
-   **Context Matters:** Expectations shift based on who initiates the date and the nature of the relationship.
-   **Nuance Prevails:** Gen Z’s views are a complex mix of appreciation for traditional gestures and a commitment to modern equality.
-   **Heteronormative Considerations:** The conversation highlights the importance of acknowledging diverse relationship dynamics.
[adsense]
---
### The Casual Date is King
The teens we spoke with overwhelmingly favored casual, low-pressure first dates focused on connection. Parks, coffee shops, and simply hanging out were popular choices.  "I would say just, like, going to the park. A nice place where we can talk," shared Lilia. This emphasis on conversation and connection underscores a desire for genuine interaction over lavish displays of generosity. When the conversation inevitably turned to dining out, the real debate began.
### A Spectrum of Perspectives
While some teens expressed appreciation for the traditional gesture of a date paying, the overwhelming sentiment revolved around fairness. Joris was forthright: "I'm paying. The guy just … pays. If I don't have money, my parents will definitely give me money to pay. That’s just kind of how I was raised."  Sophie, however, added a layer of nuance: "I think it’s sweet when someone offers to pay, which -- it’s kind of controversial. I know that some people don't like that, but I think it's sweet."  This highlights a key distinction – the appreciation for the gesture itself, rather than an expectation of it.
### Beyond the Binary:  Relationship Dynamics and Modernity
The conversation wasn’t solely about gender roles. Lilia pointed out the importance of considering relationship dynamics beyond the heteronormative framework. "Especially if you're not in a straight relationship -- that's kind of different.” Theo echoed this sentiment, adding, “I think if you ask to go, then you pay.” This demonstrates a growing awareness of diverse relationship structures and a desire for equitable interactions regardless of gender or sexual orientation. Sophie’s final comment perfectly encapsulates the Gen Z perspective: "I'm never gonna ... expect someone to pay, ever."
---
Ultimately, while Scott Galloway’s view might represent a nostalgic perspective on dating, Gen Z’s approach is far more complex. They value traditional gestures of kindness but reject the expectation of them, prioritizing fairness and acknowledging the evolving landscape of relationships. As Gen Z continues to shape dating norms, we can expect a continued emphasis on reciprocity, understanding, and a departure from rigid expectations.

NYU Professor, author, and podcast host Scott Galloway isn't shy about his opinions on dating, even if some might view them as a little old-fashioned. "I think men should pay for everything when they're on a date, even if they're economically less well off than the woman," he said recently on Katie Couric's podcast, Next Question with Katie Couric. "Because the bottom line is ... men get more from relationships than women." It's an old-school sentiment, but one that still resonates with some -- and clearly clashes with others.

We asked Lilia (17), Theo (15), Joris (16), and Sophie (19), members of the SheKnows Teen Council, to share their thoughts on dating -- particularly when it comes to that age-old question: who should pay?

When asked about ideal first dates, the teens all gravitated toward something casual, low-pressure, and connection-driven. "I would say just, like, going to the park. A nice place where we can talk," Lilia said. Hanging out and getting food were a popular consensus.

But when it came to the latter -- going out to eat -- the real debate began once money entered the chat.

"I think going out to dinner is really nice," said Sophie. "I think it's sweet when someone offers to pay, which -- it's kind of controversial. I know that some people don't like that, but I think it's sweet."

"I'm paying," declared Joris. "The guy just ... pays. If I don't have money, my parents will definitely give me money to pay. That's just kind of how I was raised."

These views reflect what New York Times opinion writer Jessica Grose recently observed in her own reporting on Gen Z. "Dozens of conversations with members of Gen Z have convinced me that the most prominent aspect of their generational character is that they're small‑c conservative," she wrote. But it's not about political allegiance -- it's about values. "They're constitutionally moderate and driven by old-fashioned values."

Still, these teens aren't all fully relying on traditional norms to shape their expectations. "I honestly think, like, it's whoever asks the person out," said Lilia, noting the heteronormative aspect of the whole situation: "Especially if you're not in a straight relationship -- that's kind of different." Theo agreed: "I think if you ask to go, then you pay." And Sophie was quick to clarify that while she thinks it's great when a date offers to pay, she'll always volunteer to split the bill.

That blend of traditional sentiment and modern equality is exactly what shows up in conversations like these. Teens are open to someone else picking up the tab -- but only when it's framed as thoughtful, not expected. Still, the dominant vibe is fairness. As Sophie put it, "I'm never gonna ... expect someone to pay, ever."

So while Scott Galloway might see men footing the bill as a modern form of respect, Gen Z's take is a little more nuanced: appreciation without assumption, and tradition with a twist.

Paying for Dates? Gen Z Has Opinions -- & They're Not What You'd Expect

# Stallion's Name Out to be Made Proud in Lightning Stakes
![title](https://api.nakmo.net/media/images/zQi79esKCZq9-1e22a622-5bb8-441b-a547-e304cc339ee775-medium_webp.webp)
## Can an Obscure Pedigree Produce a Stakes Winner?
The world of horse racing is full of intriguing stories, and this weekend’s Listed Lightning Stakes at Morphettville features one particularly compelling narrative: the chance for largely forgotten stallion, Tamasa, to make his mark. A talented daughter of his, the filly Cicala, is poised to run, carrying the hopes of a small stable and the potential to elevate a sire whose stud career was cut drastically short.
---
- **Tamasa's Legacy:** A son of *So You Think*, Tamasa had a brief and unsuccessful stint at stud, covering only four mares.
- **Cicala's Untapped Potential:** This filly's unbeaten racing record and impressive trial performances have generated significant buzz.
- **Obscure Pedigree, Latent Ability:** Despite her unusual lineage, Cicala has shown remarkable talent and has thrived since her last win.
- **Wet Track Advantage:** The predicted heavy track conditions are expected to suit Cicala’s running style.
- **Local Hope:** Cicala is considered the best of the local horses competing in the Lightning Stakes.
[adsense]
---
### A Brief but Bright Career
Tamasa’s story is one of what might have been. Trained by the renowned Darren Weir and Lindsey Smith, he won five races and achieved Group 3 placing in Perth before a short and ultimately disappointing stint at stud. His limited opportunities meant he barely had a chance to make an impact as a sire. Now, his daughter, Cicala, offers a second chance to showcase the potential inherited from her father.
### The Discovery of a Talent
The Will Clarken and Niki O’Shea-trained filly’s rise to prominence is as interesting as her pedigree. Stable Racing Manager Lachie Weekley explained that Cicala was purchased from her original trainer, Jackson Matthews, based on several impressive trial performances. "Jackson had a couple in work and was going to do something else (stop training) and he mentioned to us to have a look at her," Weekley recounted.  The stable recognized latent ability and decided to take a chance, a decision that has already proven fruitful.
### Facing the Competition
Victorian filly *Fieldelo* is currently the favourite for the Lightning Stakes, but Cicala is rated as the best of the local horses at $6. The predicted heavy conditions are expected to favor Cicala, and her wide draw is also anticipated to be advantageous later in the day. “We’re really looking forward to Saturday and the wet ground holds no fears,” Weekley said.  Rochelle Milnes will be in the saddle, and is almost certainly to be crowned Adelaide's Premiership-winning jockey on Saturday.
### Looking Ahead
Cicala's performance in the Lightning Stakes is more than just a race; it's a potential turning point for the legacy of Tamasa. Regardless of the outcome, her story highlights the unpredictable nature of both racing and breeding, and the enduring hope that even from an obscure lineage, a champion can emerge. The racing world will be watching closely to see if this talented filly can live up to the potential of her father and etch her name in the history books.

He only covered four mares during a short-lived tenure at stud but unheralded stallion Tamasa can become a Stakes-producing sire when his talented daughter Cicala tackles Saturday's Listed Lightning Stakes (1050m) at Morphettville.

The Will Clarken and Niki O'Shea-trained filly has turned heads with an unbeaten start to her racing career, including a comprehensive last-start defeat of subsequent city winner Noetzie.

The stable's Racing Manager Lachie Weekley said Cicala was purchased from her original trainer Jackson Matthews off the back of several impressive trials.

She is one of only three foals sired by Tamasa during two seasons at stud - only one other has raced and he is a six-start maiden in Victoria.

A son of So You Think that was trained by Darren Weir and Lindsey Smith, Tamasa won five races and was Group 3 placed in Perth.

"She's an interesting horse with an obscure pedigree but one that has always shown latent ability and she's just thrived since her last win," Weekley said.

"She's by a horse called Tamasa who had an enormous amount of ability when Darren Weir trained him.

"Jackson had a couple in work and was going to do something else (stop training) and he mentioned to us to have a look at her.

"We had a look at a couple of her trials and we decided to buy her, thankfully Jackson stayed in the ownership and we've had a lot of fun already."

Cicala will be ridden by Rochelle Milnes, who will almost certainly be crowned Adeliade's Premierhsip-winning jockey on Saturday.

Weekley said he expects the filly to be effective on the predicted heavy conditions, with Adelaide set to receive up to 50mm of rain across Friday and Saturday.

Victorian filly Fieldelo is the favourite for the Lightning Stakes, with Cicala rated the best of the local horses at $6.

"We're really looking forward to Saturday and the wet ground holds no fears," he said.

"She's drawn out a bit and that will probably suit by that stage in the day.

"She's a really talented filly."

Stallion's name out to be made proud in Lightning Stakes

# Senate Demand Probe into US Citizen Killed by Israeli Settlers
![title](https://api.nakmo.net/media/images/zQi79esKCZq9-1e22a622-5bb8-441b-a547-e304cc339ee775-medium_webp.webp)
## Pressure Mounts on Biden Administration Following Tragic Death in West Bank
The U.S. Senate is demanding a thorough investigation into the death of Saif Musallet, an American citizen tragically killed by Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank.  More than half of the Democratic senators are urging the Biden administration to take action, highlighting a pattern of impunity surrounding the deaths of American citizens in the region. This escalating pressure reflects growing concerns about accountability and the protection of U.S. citizens abroad.
---
-   **Senate Inquiry:** 29 Democratic senators led by Chris Van Hollen are calling for an independent investigation.
-   **Pattern of Impunity:** Concerns raised over a recurring lack of accountability in the deaths of other Americans in the West Bank.
-   **Escalating Violence:** Settler attacks on Palestinians have increased since the start of the Israel-Gaza conflict in October 2023.
-   **U.S. Citizen Victim:** Saif Musallet, a 20-year-old from Florida, was severely beaten and died before reaching a hospital.
-   **Diplomatic Intervention:** U.S. Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, has called the incident a "criminal and terrorist act."
[adsense]
---
### A Growing Crisis
The death of Saif Musallet has ignited a firestorm of criticism and demands for action within the U.S. Senate. Senator Van Hollen and his colleagues have penned a letter to Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Attorney General Merrick Garland, explicitly requesting an independent investigation into the circumstances surrounding Musallet's death. This isn’t an isolated incident; the senators emphasized a worrying trend of Americans losing their lives in the West Bank since January 2022, with little to no accountability for those responsible.
### Settler Violence and Diplomatic Response
The surge in settler violence against Palestinians has been a particularly alarming development since the outbreak of the war in Gaza. While tensions have long existed in the West Bank, the current climate has exacerbated the situation.  The response from U.S. Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, calling Musallet's death a "criminal and terrorist act," was noteworthy, given his past support for Israeli settlement construction.  This statement, however, underscores the seriousness with which the Biden administration views this issue.
### The Need for Accountability
> “The United States must hold those responsible for the death of Saif Musallet accountable and ensure the safety and security of all American citizens abroad," the senators stated in their letter.
The senators’ demands go beyond a simple inquiry; they seek updates on investigations into other deaths of American citizens in the West Bank, signaling a desire for systemic change. The pressure now rests on the Biden administration to demonstrate a commitment to protecting the rights and safety of Americans residing in or visiting the occupied territories.
The unfolding situation surrounding Saif Musallet’s death serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of life and the urgent need for accountability in the West Bank. As the conflict continues, the U.S. faces increasing pressure to ensure the safety and rights of its citizens, and to advocate for a resolution that promotes stability and justice in the region.

More than half of the Democrats in the U.S. Senate called on President Donald Trump's administration on Thursday to conduct an independent investigation into the death of Saif Musallet, an American citizen beaten to death by Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank.

Senator Chris Van Hollen of Maryland led 28 other Democrats in a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Attorney General Pam Bondi seeking an investigation, adding to pressure from Washington for accountability in Musallet's death.

The senators also noted what they called the repeated lack of accountability in the deaths of other Americans killed in the West Bank since January 2022, and asked for updates on the status of investigations into those killings.

Musallet, 20, whose full first name is Sayafollah, was severely beaten this month when he was visiting family in Sinjil. His family, who are from Florida, said medics failed to reach him for hours and he died before reaching the hospital.

Settler attacks on Palestinians in the West Bank have risen since the start of Israel's war in Gaza in October 2023, though violence has long simmered in the territory.

U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee said on 15 July he had asked Israel to "aggressively investigate" Musallet's death, describing it as a "criminal and terrorist act."

The comments by Huckabee, a staunch supporter of Israeli settlement construction, marked a rare and pointed public intervention by the U.S. following the death of a Palestinian American in the Israeli-occupied territory.

Senate demand probe into US citizen killed by Israeli settlers

# Paramount and Skydance Merger Approved After Contentious Legal Battle
![title](https://api.nakmo.net/media/images/zQi79esKCZq9-1e22a622-5bb8-441b-a547-e304cc339ee775-medium_webp.webp)
## Hollywood Meets Politics: $8 Billion Deal Clears Final Hurdle
Federal regulators have given the green light for Paramount’s $8 billion deal with Skydance, bringing an end to a protracted saga marked by legal challenges and public outcry. The approval from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) follows months of uncertainty and a controversial settlement with President Donald Trump, raising serious questions about editorial independence and corporate accountability.
---
-   The FCC has formally approved the Paramount-Skydance merger, ending a period of intense scrutiny.
-   Paramount agreed to a $16 million settlement with President Trump to resolve legal battles related to "60 Minutes."
-   Critics have condemned the settlement as a potential "bribe" to secure regulatory approval.
-   The cancellation of *Stephen Colbert’s* "Late Show" has further fueled controversy surrounding the deal.
-   FCC Chairman Brendan Carr believes the merger will promote balance and trust in the CBS network.
[adsense]
---
### A Deal Shrouded in Controversy
The road to approval for this merger has been anything but smooth. The core of the issue revolved around President Trump’s ongoing legal dispute with CBS, the flagship network under Paramount's ownership.  To secure the FCC’s blessing, Paramount reached a $16 million settlement, a move swiftly criticized as an attempt to appease the administration and circumvent potential roadblocks. The optics were particularly damaging, raising concerns about the potential for undue influence on journalistic integrity.
### The Colbert Factor and Doubts Over Motives
Adding another layer of complexity, the abrupt cancellation of *Stephen Colbert's* "Late Show" shortly after the comedian publicly criticized Paramount's settlement sent shockwaves through the industry. While Paramount attributed the decision to financial considerations, many within and outside the company suspect a more strategic motive – silencing a prominent voice critical of the corporation's actions. This has amplified the perception of a company prioritizing profit over principle.
### FCC's Perspective and the Future of CBS
FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, in his statement, expressed a desire for renewed trust in the CBS network. > "Americans no longer trust the legacy national news media to report fully, accurately, and fairly. It is time for a change." His remarks highlight a broader concern about the declining public trust in mainstream media and suggest the merger could be viewed as an opportunity to reshape the network's approach. The combined entity now faces the challenge of rebuilding that trust while navigating the complexities of a media landscape increasingly shaped by political polarization and digital disruption.
### Looking Ahead
The approval of the Paramount-Skydance merger marks a significant moment for Hollywood and the media industry, but the fallout from the preceding turmoil is far from over.  The combined company must now address the concerns raised about editorial independence and corporate accountability to ensure a sustainable future, while the broader implications for the relationship between media and politics remain a crucial point of observation.

NEW YORK (AP) -- Federal regulators on Thursday approved Paramount's $8 billion merger with Skydance, clearing the way to close a deal that combined Hollywood glitz with political intrigue.

The stamp of approval from the Federal Communications Commission comes after months of turmoil revolving around President Donald Trump's legal battle with "60 Minutes," the crown jewel of Paramount-owned broadcast network CBS. With the specter of the Trump administration potentially blocking the hard-fought deal with Skydance, Paramount earlier this month agreed to pay a $16 million settlement with the President.

Critics of the settlement lambasted it as a veiled a bribe to appease Trump, amid rising alarm over editorial independence overall. Further outrage also emerged after CBS said it was canceling Stephen Colbert's "Late Show" just days after the comedian sharply criticized the parent company's settlement on air. Paramount cited financial reasons, but big names both within and outside the company have questioned those motives.

In a statement accompanying the deal's approval, FCC Chairman Brendan Carr hailed the merger as an opportunity to bring more balance to "once-storied" CBS network.

"Americans no longer trust the legacy national news media to report fully, accurately, and fairly. It is time for a change," Carr said.

Federal regulators approve Paramount's $8 billion deal with Skydance, capping months of turmoil

# Trump Confronts Powell in Unprecedented Fed Visit, Backs Off Threat of Firing
![title](https://api.nakmo.net/media/images/zQi79esKCZq9-1e22a622-5bb8-441b-a547-e304cc339ee775-medium_webp.webp)
## A Rare Showdown Over Rates and Renovations
President Donald Trump made a highly unusual visit to the Federal Reserve headquarters this week, directly confronting Chairman Jerome Powell over the central bank’s costly renovations and the ongoing pressure for lower interest rates. The visit, marked by tense exchanges and a surprising public statement of support for Powell, underscores the escalating conflict between the administration and the independent monetary authority.
---
- **Unprecedented Confrontation:** Trump’s visit to the Federal Reserve is a significant departure from established norms, highlighting the administration’s increasing scrutiny of the central bank.
- **Renovation Cost Dispute:** A major point of contention revolved around the cost of renovations, with Trump alleging a $3.1 billion price tag, significantly higher than the Fed’s estimate.
- **Powell’s Independence:** Despite months of public criticism and pressure to lower rates, Powell reaffirmed the Fed’s commitment to independent decision-making.
- **Limited Removal Power:** Legally, Trump cannot remove Powell without "cause," a crucial safeguard for the Fed’s autonomy.
- **Market Stability Concerns:** Economists warn that any attempt to remove Powell could trigger financial market instability.
[adsense]
---
### A Clash of Perspectives
The visit was framed around a tour of the Federal Reserve's ongoing renovations, which have faced substantial cost overruns. Trump’s accusations of mismanagement and inflated costs were met with Powell’s explanation that the President's figures included costs for a separate, already completed building. The episode exemplifies the ongoing tension surrounding the Fed’s independence and its role in managing the U.S. economy. The President’s public statements have consistently pressured Powell to lower interest rates, a move the Fed has resisted, citing concerns about inflation and the impact of tariffs.
### Powell's Steadfastness and Future Prospects
Despite the public scrutiny, Powell maintained his position, emphasizing the Fed's commitment to data-driven decisions. The President’s comment that he wouldn't fire Powell, despite his history of dismissing employees for cost overruns, suggests a calculated move to publicly de-escalate the situation. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, a potential replacement floated by the administration, recently echoed this sentiment, stating Powell has been a "good public servant." With Powell’s term extending to May 2026, the delicate balance between political pressure and monetary policy will continue to be a defining characteristic of the current economic landscape.
### Looking Ahead
The extraordinary events of this week highlight the challenges of maintaining the Federal Reserve’s independence in a politically charged environment. While the immediate threat of Powell’s removal seems to have subsided, the underlying tensions remain. The Federal Reserve's decision next week regarding interest rates will likely be closely watched, and the ongoing scrutiny from the administration is unlikely to disappear.

President Donald Trump confronted Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell in a rare visit to the central bank's headquarters as it's been undergoing a costly renovation.Standing in the middle of the construction project, Trump charged that the renovation would cost $3.1 billion, much higher than the Fed's $2.5 billion figure and the original $1.9 billion estimate. While looking at a paper presented to him by the president, the fed chair said the president was including the cost of renovating a separate Fed building that was finished five years ago.Trump's Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought sent a letter to Powell saying the president is "extremely troubled" that the renovation may have violated government building rules.The president put two close aides on a commission to review the Federal Reserve building plans.It all comes as Trump has been pressuring Powell for months to lower interest rates, urging him to resign and calling him a "numbskull." On the tour, Trump joked he would back off Powell if he lowered rates, but Powell maintained that the central bank is holding rates steady to see how tariffs impact inflation. It's been an extraordinary attempt to reshape the central bank, which has traditionally decided U.S. monetary policy without a political leaning.Although Trump appointed Powell in 2018, legally, he cannot remove him without "cause." Economists warn that removing a Fed chair could shake financial markets and create instability in the U.S. economy.During the tour, Trump said during his career as a real estate developer, he would fire someone for cost overruns but said he wouldn't fire Powell. "To do that is a big move and I just don't think it's necessary. And I believe that he's going to do the right thing," Trump said.Powell's term is set to end May 2026.Plans for the renovation were first approved by the Fed's governing board in 2017. The fed says part of the reason for cost overrun for the renovation is because of the complications of underground construction, tariffs and building materials have soared in price since the original estimate. Fed staff also pointed to the complication of historic renovations, both buildings have significant preservation needs.The president will likely be disappointed again next week, as the overwhelming expectation is that the fed will hold rates steady in its Wednesday announcement.Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, whom Trump has floated as a potential replacement for Powell, said in a recent interview with Fox Business, "There's nothing that tells me that he should step down right now. He's been a good public servant."

President Donald Trump confronted Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell in a rare visit to the central bank's headquarters as it's been undergoing a costly renovation.

Standing in the middle of the construction project, Trump charged that the renovation would cost $3.1 billion, much higher than the Fed's $2.5 billion figure and the original $1.9 billion estimate.

While looking at a paper presented to him by the president, the fed chair said the president was including the cost of renovating a separate Fed building that was finished five years ago.

Trump's Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought sent a letter to Powell saying the president is "extremely troubled" that the renovation may have violated government building rules.

The president put two close aides on a commission to review the Federal Reserve building plans.

It all comes as Trump has been pressuring Powell for months to lower interest rates, urging him to resign and calling him a "numbskull."

On the tour, Trump joked he would back off Powell if he lowered rates, but Powell maintained that the central bank is holding rates steady to see how tariffs impact inflation.

It's been an extraordinary attempt to reshape the central bank, which has traditionally decided U.S. monetary policy without a political leaning.

Although Trump appointed Powell in 2018, legally, he cannot remove him without "cause." Economists warn that removing a Fed chair could shake financial markets and create instability in the U.S. economy.

During the tour, Trump said during his career as a real estate developer, he would fire someone for cost overruns but said he wouldn't fire Powell.

"To do that is a big move and I just don't think it's necessary. And I believe that he's going to do the right thing," Trump said.

Powell's term is set to end May 2026.

Plans for the renovation were first approved by the Fed's governing board in 2017.

The fed says part of the reason for cost overrun for the renovation is because of the complications of underground construction, tariffs and building materials have soared in price since the original estimate. Fed staff also pointed to the complication of historic renovations, both buildings have significant preservation needs.

The president will likely be disappointed again next week, as the overwhelming expectation is that the fed will hold rates steady in its Wednesday announcement.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, whom Trump has floated as a potential replacement for Powell, said in a recent interview with Fox Business, "There's nothing that tells me that he should step down right now. He's been a good public servant."

'I just don't think it's necessary:' President Trump tours Federal Reserve, says he won't fire the chairman

# Kentucky Oaks Races into Primetime for 2026
![title](https://api.nakmo.net/media/images/zQi79esKCZq9-1e22a622-5bb8-441b-a547-e304cc339ee775-medium_webp.webp)
## A Twilight Shift for Horse Racing’s Beloved Tradition
The Kentucky Oaks is about to get a whole lot more visible. In a move aimed at broadening its reach and attracting a wider audience, the prestigious race for 3-year-old fillies will shift to primetime television for the 152nd edition in 2026. The event, traditionally held the day before the Kentucky Derby, will now kick off at 8 p.m. ET on NBC and stream on Peacock, marking a significant change in its long-standing schedule.
---
- **Primetime Debut:** The Kentucky Oaks will be broadcast at 8 p.m. ET for the first time ever.
- **Audience Growth:** The shift is strategically designed to reach a larger and more diverse audience.
- **Long-Term Partnership:** The move underscores the ongoing and robust partnership between NBC Sports and Churchill Downs.
- **Kentucky Derby Alignment:** The Oaks’ new time aligns with the Kentucky Derby, which typically runs shortly after 7 p.m. ET.
- **Record-Breaking Derby Viewership:** This year's Kentucky Derby drew a record-breaking 17.7 million viewers, demonstrating the sport's potential for broader appeal.
[adsense]
---
### A Strategic Play for Growth
The decision to move the Kentucky Oaks to primetime isn't just about changing the time of the race; it's a calculated move to elevate the sport of horse racing to a national stage. For years, the Oaks has maintained a pre-6 p.m. ET post time, limiting its exposure to a more niche audience.  The 8 p.m. start time, coinciding with peak television viewership, significantly expands the potential audience and offers a chance to capture the attention of casual sports fans who might not regularly tune in.
### Leveraging the NBC Partnership
The extended deal between NBC Sports and Churchill Downs, running through 2032, provides a stable platform for promoting the Kentucky Oaks and Kentucky Derby.  Having first aired on NBC in 2001, the network has become synonymous with the iconic races, and this latest change reinforces their commitment to showcasing the sport.  The impressive viewership numbers for this year's Derby – averaging 17.7 million and peaking at 21.8 million – highlight the potential for continued growth and demonstrate the power of a primetime broadcast.
> "By moving the Kentucky Oaks to primetime, we're giving one of horse racing's most treasured traditions the national stage it deserves," said Bill Carstanjen, CEO of Churchill Downs.
### Looking Ahead
The shift to primetime for the Kentucky Oaks signals a renewed focus on growing the sport of horse racing and attracting a wider audience. With the Kentucky Derby already proving its potential for massive viewership, the Oaks’ twilight debut in 2026 promises to be a pivotal moment, potentially ushering in a new era of visibility and excitement for one of America's most beloved traditions.

The Kentucky Oaks is shifting to primetime for the 152nd edition of the race for 3-year-old fillies.It will be run at 8 p.m. ET on NBC and streaming on Peacock on May 1, 2026, Churchill Downs and NBC Sports announced Thursday.The $1.5 million race that is traditionally held the day before the Kentucky Derby has had a post time shortly before 6 p.m. ET for years. Next year will be the first time it's been run as late as 8 p.m., which puts it in twilight in the Eastern Time Zone."By moving the Kentucky Oaks to primetime, we're giving one of horse racing's most treasured traditions the national stage it deserves," said Bill Carstanjen, CEO of Churchill Downs. "This decision is rooted in our commitment to growing the sport, reaching new audiences and creating unforgettable experiences for our fans."The 152nd Kentucky Derby will air May 2 on NBC and streaming on Peacock. The race typically goes off shortly after 7 p.m. ET. This year's Derby, won by Sovereignty, was the most watched edition since 1989. The audience averaged an NBC record of 17.7 million, peaking at 21.8 million from 7-7:15 p.m. ET during the race.Last year, NBC Sports and Churchill Downs extended their deal to air the Derby through 2032, making the network the longest running home of the race. It first aired on NBC in 2001.

The Kentucky Oaks is shifting to primetime for the 152nd edition of the race for 3-year-old fillies.

It will be run at 8 p.m. ET on NBC and streaming on Peacock on May 1, 2026, Churchill Downs and NBC Sports announced Thursday.

The $1.5 million race that is traditionally held the day before the Kentucky Derby has had a post time shortly before 6 p.m. ET for years. Next year will be the first time it's been run as late as 8 p.m., which puts it in twilight in the Eastern Time Zone.

"By moving the Kentucky Oaks to primetime, we're giving one of horse racing's most treasured traditions the national stage it deserves," said Bill Carstanjen, CEO of Churchill Downs. "This decision is rooted in our commitment to growing the sport, reaching new audiences and creating unforgettable experiences for our fans."

The 152nd Kentucky Derby will air May 2 on NBC and streaming on Peacock. The race typically goes off shortly after 7 p.m. ET. This year's Derby, won by Sovereignty, was the most watched edition since 1989. The audience averaged an NBC record of 17.7 million, peaking at 21.8 million from 7-7:15 p.m. ET during the race.

Last year, NBC Sports and Churchill Downs extended their deal to air the Derby through 2032, making the network the longest running home of the race. It first aired on NBC in 2001.

Kentucky Oaks moves to primetime TV for the first time in 2026

# Tuli Tuipulotu's Rise to Leadership in the Chargers' Defense
![title](https://api.nakmo.net/media/images/zQi79esKCZq9-1e22a622-5bb8-441b-a547-e304cc339ee775-medium_webp.webp)

## From Rookie to Rising Star: Tuipulotu's Growing Impact
Tuli Tuipulotu entered his first Chargers training camp as a wide-eyed, 20-year-old second-round draft pick from USC. His quiet and shy demeanor off the field contrasted sharply with his loud and attention-grabbing play on it. Fast-forward to his third NFL season, and Tuipulotu has not only become a formidable threat to opposing quarterbacks but also a respected voice in the locker room.
---
- Tuipulotu's growing confidence on the field is mirrored by his increased vocal presence among teammates.
- He credits his veteran outside linebackers Khalil Mack and Joey Bosa for teaching him the importance of communication and leadership.
- As he takes on an enhanced role, including occasional locker room or sideline speeches, his peers are taking notice.
[adsense]
---
Tuipulotu's humility is evident as he acknowledges that his actions on the field still speak louder than words. However, with Mack now 34 and entering his 12th season, Tuipulotu is expected to start opposite him this season, marking a significant step in his development as a leader.
### A Growing Voice in the Locker Room
Tuipulotu's relationship with Bosa, who signed with the Buffalo Bills in March, remains strong. The two have swapped texts since Bosa's departure, and Tuipulotu misses having him on the team. With Bud Dupree joining the fold, the Chargers' outside linebacker rotation is set to become even more formidable.
### Defensive Coordinator Jesse Minter's Praise
Minter believes that Tuipulotu possesses a unique combination of skills – the ability to do what you want them to do and exhibit "little magic" on the field. As he continues to grow, it remains to be seen whether Tuipulotu will cement his place as one of the team's top defenders.
Tuipulotu's breakout season is just around the corner, and with it comes a new chapter in his development as a leader on the Chargers' defense.
Tuipulotu has stated that he believes this upcoming season could be an even more significant year for him than his first two. With increased responsibility and expectations, one thing is certain – Tuipulotu's impact will only continue to grow, both on and off the field.

EL SEGUNDO -- Tuli Tuipulotu arrived at his first Chargers training camp as a wide-eyed, 20-year-old second-round draft pick from USC. He approached veteran teammates and fellow outside linebackers Khalil Mack and Joey Bosa and called them "sir" and "mister" with a sense of reverence.

Tuipulotu made quite the first impression during the 2023 season, and it went far beyond being polite and respecting his elders in the locker room and on the field. He made his mark as a rookie, saying far more with his actions during practices and games than by opening his mouth.

He was quiet and shy off the field.

His play on the field was loud and attention-grabbing.

He was courteous off the field.

He was a menacing threat to opposing quarterbacks on the field.

Entering his third NFL season, Tuipulotu has embraced an enhanced role that now includes an occasional locker room or sideline speech to his teammates, something that was unthinkable when he was a rookie. Slowly but certainly, over 34 games, he has commanded additional respect from his peers.

"He's a quiet dude, but when he speaks, everybody listens to him," Mack said Friday of his younger and less experienced teammate. "It's good to see him kind of coming into himself from a vocal standpoint, especially when he's on the field. Just want to see more from him from that standpoint."

Tuipulotu said after the second day of training camp that he hasn't accomplished enough so far in his young career to be an outspoken leader, to be that rah-rah guy in the locker room or on the field. He insisted he must continue to let his play do the talking for him.

No question, Tuipulotu, 22, will get that opportunity this season, what with Mack now 34 and entering his 12th season and with Bosa having been released by the Chargers and signing with the Buffalo Bills. Tuipulotu is expected to start opposite Mack this season, his first as a full-time starter.

"Every year, I feel like, coming into it, it's going to be a big year," Tuipulotu said when asked if he believed the 2025 season could be even more of a breakout season for him than his first two. "That was my mindset going into last year and it's going to be the same coming into this year."

Tuipulotu said he has swapped texts with Bosa since Bosa's departure in March.

"I hope he's doing good, but, yeah, I miss him," Tuipulotu said of Bosa.

Tuipulotu, Mack and Bosa formed a rotation for most of the past two seasons, but especially in 2024. Tuipulotu made 11 starts in 2023 and nine in '24. He had 4.5 sacks among his 53 combined tackles as a rookie and led the Chargers with 8.5 sacks among his 42 tackles this past season.

Tuipulotu and Mack are expected to be joined by veteran Bud Dupree, who might also earn more playing time during the 2025 season with Bosa playing with Buffalo. Dupree, who is entering his 11th season in the NFL, was a valuable depth player last season, and he might be even more so this year.

"You don't want a guy to be comfortable, but also within a defense you can get more comfortable and you can learn, and he knows exactly what we want him to do," said Jesse Minter, entering his second season as the Chargers' defensive coordinator. "He also has a playmaking skill-set, too.

"I think the really good players, it's like, can they do what you want them to do? Do they also have that little magic where sometimes they go outside the realm and make a play? The really good, productive players have always been that way. I think he can be that. I think he's done a great job of taking advantage of the opportunity."

Jamaree Salyer slotted into Mekhi Becton's spot at right guard for Friday's practice, joining left tackle Rashawn Slater, left guard Bradley Bozeman, center Zion Johnson and right tackle Joe Alt. Becton had a good excuse for missing practice. He received his Super Bowl ring with the Philadelphia Eagles. ...

Chuka Ndulue has joined the Chargers' coaching staff under the Spanos Coaching Fellowship program. He'll be assisting the Chargers' defensive linemen after spending last season as the defensive line coach at Colorado State. He also has coached at New Mexico, Southern Illinois and Oklahoma.

Chargers OLB Tuli Tuipulotu raising his game and voice

# Epstein Week: A Guide to Getting Away with It
![title](https://api.nakmo.net/media/images/zQi79esKCZq9-1e22a622-5bb8-441b-a547-e304cc339ee775-medium_webp.webp)

## When the Accused Become the Prosecutors
The latest developments in the Epstein saga have taken a dramatic turn, with former associates now pointing fingers at each other. Despite promises of transparency, the situation has only become more complicated.
---
- The key players involved are Bondi, Patel, and Bongino, who have all agreed to "close" the Epstein Files issue.
- However, their efforts have been met with resistance, leading to a tangled web of accusations and counter-accusations.
- The release of the files themselves has been hindered by the Trump Administration's failure to act decisively.
[adsense]
---
### A Proposal for Redemption
In light of this chaos, it appears that a special counsel may be appointed to investigate the matter further. However, this move is complicated by the fact that the Trump Administration has already botched the issue by claiming there is "no list" only to later discover another one.
### The Consequences of Inaction
The longer the administration waits to address the situation, the more severe the consequences will be. Not only will it damage their reputation further, but it may also lead to a second trial for the administration's handling of the issue.
### A Way Forward
In order to salvage the situation, the Trump Administration needs to take decisive action and produce a list of those involved in the Epstein scandal. However, this move would require them to prosecute not only those directly involved but also the individuals who hid the authentic list from them.
---
It's clear that the situation is complex and fraught with challenges. However, by taking a step back and analyzing the situation objectively, it becomes apparent that there are some key takeaways:
-   The Trump Administration's inaction has exacerbated the situation.
-   A special counsel may be appointed to investigate further.
-   Prosecuting those involved would require producing a list of those guilty.
In conclusion, the Epstein saga serves as a stark reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability. While it's unclear how the situation will unfold, one thing is certain: someone will have to take responsibility for their actions.

Welcome to Epstein Week and Session 201 in Whitewashing your bosses' dirty deeds.

If you allow me, we shall review from our previous meeting before we commence.

Since the last notation, things have only become worse. Despite Bondi, Patel and Bongino EACH agreeing to "closing" the Epstein Files issue, they are now tangling and targeting one another.

SO...yeah...there is basically no way this is going away...and it ALL could have been dealt with easily.

How? Well, obviously, releasing the files themselves. Only, knowing what we know, that was not going to happen -- ever. Except, had the Trump Administration not been foolish it could be arranged.

My "Step By Step Guide To Getting Away With It" is now available on Amazon for the Low, Low Price of $17.76...KIDDING...it is all right down below...for free...

Listen up, chum, somebody is going down here. Trump promised a List, but you and I both know the reason that isn't possible. Except he has to give The Public something. That would be you. Maybe. We've gone over your medical records. We know you're sick.

Nobody is threatening you here. I'm the Deal Offerer, and this is it.

You allow us to "Indict" you on this Epstein matter. You're never going to trial. We'll make sure of that much. You've got about six months to live and we can drag things out. We'll allow you to "maintain innocence", but make no mistake, the Press and Public will consider you Guilty even without a Conviction. So it will be humiliating for you, no joke.

During all this, you don't talk about anything "on advice of counsel". You don't talk about other Clients. You don't talk about the Girls. You don't try to make deals. Nada, Zilch, No.

What you get in return? We'll keep you out of prison until you die. We'll set up your wife and kids, or grandkids, after you are gone. We'll let it drop after you pass, as in, "Well, we suspected him, but there was no Conviction, so we don't really know..." and you can have SOME kind of legacy for your descendants and those folks who continue to support you.

Likewise, we are Gentlemen, so if there is something aside from the money, we can kibbitz.

Also, may I remind, you actually did it. -- No, no, no, please...no excuses...I get it...everyone has their reasons. We're not about that today, pal. -- I'm only saying, you did do it. Nobody here is framing you. So no need for outrage or righteous indignation.

Just take it like a man. Turn this into a positive. Make your family wealthy.

Lastly, as I'm sure you know, that List is...exhaustive. I'm seeing a few others today about this matter and whoever takes the deal is the one we're going to protect. No threats, understand. We're not coming for more than one of you...but only one gets the cash.

And that's it. You pick ONE and even then it's a mutual concord on who is the Premiere Defendant.

Let The Public focus on this ONE person and have him become the proverbial Enemy Of The People.

It would have been on the covers of magazines and showing on talk programs the next half a year.

Don, as discussed ad nauseum, voters elected you to DRAIN the swamp...not become the swamp.

Moreover, there are the psychological aspects of the situation.

And Epstein was the Worst Offender of the Worst Crime -- so folks aren't "moving on".

But Sex? EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS.

Girl to Pimp to John. It's that simple. There are ZERO VOTERS who can not get this much.

Tariffs? Applied when the Party of the First Part is Contracted with the Party of the Second Part to manufacture not less than the majority of Aforementioned Product within the National Boundaries of the Constituted Government presiding over the Domain of the...*sheesh*...even I'm bored!

The People vote for slogans -- and Sex is the most popular catchphrase of all time.

Trump, lately I am hearing about a "Special Counsel"...but you f*cked this up so badly that can't help.

The reason? You can NOT claim there is "No List" and then suddenly "discover" ANOTHER List.

Or maaayyybbbeee...

If this gets worse (and it might) you better choose someone in your Administration and excoriate them for "hiding" the "Authentic List" which you were told did not exist...then, "OH HEY!, we found some remnant of an intentionally deleted file and it has THIS ONE NAME on there we can Convict!"

It would also require that you NOT ONLY prosecute this "One Discovered John" but ALSO the dastardly person in your Administration whom "hid the Authentic List" from you.

So, because of your carelessness, that's now TWO trials you are going to have to prosecute; one of which is your own former employee in the Administration...except you MIGHT be able to sell it as a "Man, I'm so angry! But we all know how it feels to be betrayed by someone you trust, Am I Right?"

That's your best chance, and it is an undoubtedly The Nuclear Option; so don't use it until necessary.

Next time have an expert solve things before they become "A Thing".

Enchiridion for Epstein - Sound Ways of Salacious Suppression

# Car vs Semi Crash: Dramatic Firefighting Rescue on I-294
![title](https://api.nakmo.net/media/images/zQi79esKCZq9-1e22a622-5bb8-441b-a547-e304cc339ee775-medium_webp.webp)

## Quick Response Saves Occupants from Inferno on Tollway
Glenview firefighters sprang into action at 12:30 p.m. Monday, July 14, after a dramatic crash involving a semi-truck and a car led to a fiery inferno on the southbound Tri-State Tollway (I-294). The swift response of emergency services was crucial in saving the occupants of both vehicles from the blaze.
---
- **Multiple Vehicles Involved**: A car fire broke out on the right shoulder after a collision with a semi-truck.
- **Swift Rescue Efforts**: Firefighters quickly extinguished the flames, and occupants were safely removed from both vehicles.
- **Primary Fire Confined**: The main fire was contained to the engine compartment of the red sedan involved in the crash.
[adsense]
---
### Heroic Actions by Emergency Services
The bravery of Glenview firefighters cannot be overstated. They responded promptly to the distress call, ensuring that all occupants were safely removed from both vehicles. Their expertise and training undoubtedly prevented a potentially tragic outcome.
### Crash Investigation Underway
As authorities investigate the cause of the crash, it is imperative for drivers to exercise caution on highways like I-294. Speed limits should be adhered to, and attention must be paid to road conditions at all times.
### Community's Appreciation for Emergency Services
The people of Glenview owe a debt of gratitude to their local firefighters who risk their lives daily in the line of duty. The selfless nature of these individuals is an inspiration to us all, reminding us of the importance of community service and public safety.
---
In conclusion, this harrowing incident on I-294 serves as a poignant reminder of the critical role emergency services play in saving lives. As we move forward, it's crucial that we continue to support our brave firefighters with appreciation and resources necessary for them to carry out their duties effectively.

Glenview firefighters responded to the southbound Tri-State Tollway (I-294) at 12:30 p.m. Monday, July 14, on reports of both a crash involving a semi-truck, and a car fire. Firefighters found the car fully involved in flames on the right shoulder of the toll road, after the two vehicles had somehow collided. Fire companies quickly extinguished the fire. Glenview fire officials said occupants of both vehicles were safely removed. The primary fire appeared to be contained to the engine compartment of a red sedan involved in the crash.

If you like this story, you can get a whole lot more practically every day of the week by subscribing to journal-topics.com. Click here to choose your preference of either print or online, or call 847-299-5511.

Glenview Firefighters Free Occupants Of Car Vs. Semi, Fire

Supreme Court to Examine Concerns Over Scope of Revision